Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo

shadowfirebird on Sat, 9 Dec 2006 15:44:52 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 22:44:47 +0000
In-reply-to: <6bf32280612090931y4b7f0e39vcda1f49eaf859068@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200612082139.09513.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <u1wn993p1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612090636s5af065dam7bce1b85517714c7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612090905w136b5c3dsb5a76af7cbe0d1e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280612090931y4b7f0e39vcda1f49eaf859068@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> But I disagreed about the interpretation of the rules *about*
> Proposals, Game Objects, etc.

Well, then perhaps your RFJ should have been about that then.  It was
about a proposal.  Sorry.  "The proposal titled..."
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo
  - From: bd

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Suggestion: Speed
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] $wgLogo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread