Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended proposal: Legal Mode

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

> I suppose I mostly don't like the fuzziness of the word 'pertaining'...

I can change that.

> What's wrong with the simpler approach of only allowing game actions
> permitted by the rules?

Nothing.  Especially if you see Nomic as a game in the same way that
scrabble is a game.  Although I wonder if it might make the game a
little limiting and end up with us having much longer, more specific
rules.

Neither is there anything wrong with treating - as Suber did - Nomic
as a model of the legal system, where everything is permitted unless
it says so in the rules.  I wonder - again, only wonder, as a newbie -
whether this might be more interesting, at least to me.

My main concern is that we pick one...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss