Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended proposal: Legal Mode

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

> I can't help but think this is the wrong approach - this rule is complex
> and hard to understand, whereas if we go the other way, and state that
> only those actions explicitly permitted by the rules are legal, then all
> this complexity goes away.

Well, firstly, I don't think any rule with only two paragraphs - one
of which is a simple sentance - can really be said to be hard to
understand.

But in any case you will note that I made two mutually exclusive
proposals.  In fact I just think that we need to have one of them; I
don't much care which.  Right now I think that there is room for
massive confusion.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss