Re: [s-d] Re: more nday 12 fun!

["Mark Walsh" <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On: 1/11/06 7:23:16 AM Peter sent:
> Subject: Re: [s-d] Re: more nday 12 fun!
>
> Antonio Dolcetta wrote:
> > the super calls, but the players pay for it
> >
> > Charles only payed for 6(12) rolls
> > the others were just free pyrotechnics
>
> Well, I was trying to argue that for each action point spent, each Super
> could call a die roll.
>
> > anyone want to call shenanigans on this ?
>
> Whatever you two ministers end up deciding as the resolution, I'll
> probably submit a CFI just to be contrary. I don't think we've had a CFI
> since at least before our rules reset 9 months ago, so it's about time for
> one. :)
>
> -- 
> Peter C.
>
This could be fun!
On close scrutiny, it appears that Antonio sent eir notice of recognition
2 minutes before I did. I've got a message to the dicemaster in my drafts
folder, and so managed to beat Antonio to the craps table by 30 seconds.
The Super (IMHO) implies a singular entity. This just happens to coincide
with some weirdness I'm having with MY mail server.
It really should be Charles who calls SHENANIGANS. The results
impact eir Stats.
Triller



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss