Re: [s-d] more nday 12 fun!

["Mark Walsh" <flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> [Original Message]
> From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 1/11/06 7:19:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] more nday 12 fun! 
>
> Thus spake Antonio Dolcetta:
> > Mark Walsh wrote:
> > 
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I train 6 times.
> > >>>>
> > >>> I recognize this.
> > >>> I'm going to try and pull all the dice with a single message.
> > >>> Triller
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> oh noes!
> > >> simultaneous Minister attention = bad
> > >> if one minister is 2 hour lagged = even worse
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -- 
> > >>
> > >> 	Antonio
> > >>
> > > The dice I rolled were 30 seconds before your's, so we'll go with
those.
> > 
> > I agree,
> > 
> > I erroneousley sent my own message to discuss, anyway.
> > Speaking of which: am I the only one that keeps forgetting to change
the 
> > recipient ? If not can we get rid of the Reply To: ? It seems I find 
> > myself changing it (when I remember to do it) more often than leaving
it 
> > as set.
>
> Ah, the fun of changing list settings. It's a 5 second job for me to
change
> that, but it's always a monumental struggle to ascertain if the players as
> a group want the change made. You guys should create an office like the
> Minister of Public Opinion, who takes polls and then informs me of the
> result.
>  
> >  > Interestingly, (are you listening Joel), it is now 06:55 here in 
> > California.
> >  > Antonio's messages were received by me and stamped received at
> >  > 08:50. Something @ earthlink is FUBAR.
> >  >
> >  >
> > 
> > so you get them at the correct time, but they are mislabeled ?
>
> No, I think he's saying that your messages are still being delayed.
> Something at earthlink is sitting on your messages, and maybe isn't
> adding a Received header saying so.
>  
> -- 
> J.
>
Antonio has it right. I'm getting the messages as he's posting them
(within seconds). Earthlink is labeling my receipt time 2 hours later
than it actually is. As I said. FUBAR!! The only problem I have 
with this is that the time sequence of messages in my mailbox
don't correspond with the actual sequence of events. The [s-b]
threads reflect receipt time accurately and should be the defining
authority as to what has precedence.
Triller



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss