Re: [s-d] Re: BvS submits p65 I Find problem.

[Alex Truelsen <dichotomousmind@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/11/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Alex Truelsen <dichotomousmind@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Comments are ignored in that they can't directly change the ruleset, but 
> a
> > proposal with a story written within comments is a story proposal and
> > recognized as such. So it works out. Comments also aren't completely 
> ignored
> > - explanations in comments can attempt to explain how a rule should be
> > interpreted, they just don't have force of law.
> 
> That might'a been how it used to work, but the current definition of
> Comment Text, at the end of Rule 1-2, says 'In a Game Document, with
> the exception of this paragraph, text between doubled square brackets
> (that is, text between "[[" and "]]"), shall be deemed Comment Text
> and completely ignored.'
> 
> I hadn't realized some of the implications of that when I wrote it...
> I think that EugeneMeidinger may have a valid point here.


Well... I can get around that easily enough for this nweek... should a 
proposal be made to fix that, or a Tweak, and who gets the proposal if one 
is needed?

[[BvS]]

--
> Peter C.
> Going to church does not make a person religious, nor does going to
> school make a person educated, any more than going to a garage makes a
> person a car.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss