Alex Truelsen on Sun, 8 May 2005 22:23:22 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] CFI |
On 5/8/05, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On May 8, 2005, at 11.02 PM, Alex Truelsen wrote: > > > I submit the following CFI: > > > > {{ > > == You can't have that, that's me! == > > > > Defendant: Raelus > > > > Statement: Baron von Skippy is the Owner of the Soul of Mithrandir. > > Raelus' > > attempt to claim and Pwn all unclaimed Souls was aborted as soon as e > > attempted to claim the Soul of Mithrandir. Additionally, BvS does not > > possess the Soul of Teucer, nor did e make a Tiles play in the > > center-center > > Zone. > > Unfortunately, this will almost certainly be voted down since it > includes too much. I agree that Raelus could not claim the Soul of > Mithrandir. This is because Mithrandir and The Baron were the same > player, and thus there is only one soul for the two of them. Also, I > don't see why eir later actions should fail just because eir first one > did, nor why the fact that you and Mithrandir have the same soul should > mean you can't play Tiles. I can't play Tiles because if I owned Mithrandir's Soul, then I couldn't claim Teucer's, and I used Teucer's. I'm just trying to cover all of the effects of that - if the first bit is acceptable, then the rest is as well via a kind of domino effect... but perhaps it is a little much. I'll amend it and just include the rest of those effects as comment text, so if it does get called true, we know what to change. Also, I say Mithrandir and BvS have two different Souls because those are two different players - but one Outsider. The rules are a little fuzzy about the distinction, hence that scam working in the first place (although in retrospect, there have /got/ to be easier ways to get a second vote...). [[BvS]] -- > Wonko > > "You start coding. I'll go find out what they want." > -- Computer analyst to programmer > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss