Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] CFI

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On May 8, 2005, at 11.23 PM, Alex Truelsen wrote:

> I can't play Tiles because if I owned Mithrandir's Soul, then I 
> couldn't
> claim Teucer's, and I used Teucer's. I'm just trying to cover all of 
> the
> effects of that - if the first bit is acceptable, then the rest is as 
> well
> via a kind of domino effect... but perhaps it is a little much. I'll 
> amend
> it and just include the rest of those effects as comment text, so if 
> it does
> get called true, we know what to change.
>
> Also, I say Mithrandir and BvS have two different Souls because those 
> are
> two different players - but one Outsider. The rules are a little fuzzy 
> about
> the distinction, hence that scam working in the first place (although 
> in
> retrospect, there have /got/ to be easier ways to get a second 
> vote...).

Under the current rules, at least, a player is an Outsider who consents 
to be governed by the rules. If the Outsiders are the same, then so are 
the players. I actually think it was illegal under the rules as of when 
Mithrandir was around (I looked it up shortly after you revealed that 
you were e, but don't remember the details). You're right that nothing 
forbid an outsider from having two players, but only because it was 
impossible by definition, since Player was defined as a subclass of 
Outsider.

--
Wonko

How can you prove whether at this moment we are sleeping, and all our 
thoughts are a dream; or whether we are awake, and talking to one 
another in the waking state?
                -- Plato

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss