Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Raelus amends p29

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Apr 28, 2005, at 5.46 PM, eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I just want to make sure of something. If I challenge someone they can 
> just wager one amplitude while I can wager up to a third of  the lower 
> of our two amplitudes?
>
> Also wonko is there a way you could make a script for simultanious 
> information realeasing? I want something so I can play rock papaer 
> scissors so I can include that kinds of mechanic in future games. 
> Other wise bluffing of any sort is impossible.

The RPS of old just chose a neutral third party to reveal the scores. 
Also, Joel wrote a program that basically does this: you give it a 
message and list of recipients, and it emails the recipients, waits for 
them all to respond, and then publishes their responses once 
everybody's replied.

Joel explained to me once how to use it, but I don't think I still have 
that email saved, so you'd have to ask him again (or I may have just 
done so, if he's watching this list).

--
Wonko

"AALST (n.) One who changes his name to be further to the front"
  -- Douglas Adams, _The Meaning of Liff_

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss