Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Raelus amends p29

[eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx]

What about adding a mailbox that we can cc to the information we send to the third  party so we can always check back if there is a disagreement? And set it to delete everything older than two weeks. A possibility perhaps? 


> 
> On Apr 28, 2005, at 5.46 PM, eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > I just want to make sure of something. If I challenge someone they can 
> > just wager one amplitude while I can wager up to a third of  the lower 
> > of our two amplitudes?
> >
> > Also wonko is there a way you could make a script for simultanious 
> > information realeasing? I want something so I can play rock papaer 
> > scissors so I can include that kinds of mechanic in future games. 
> > Other wise bluffing of any sort is impossible.
> 
> The RPS of old just chose a neutral third party to reveal the scores. 
> Also, Joel wrote a program that basically does this: you give it a 
> message and list of recipients, and it emails the recipients, waits for 
> them all to respond, and then publishes their responses once 
> everybody's replied.
> 
> Joel explained to me once how to use it, but I don't think I still have 
> that email saved, so you'd have to ask him again (or I may have just 
> done so, if he's watching this list).
> 
> -- 
> Wonko
> 
> "AALST (n.) One who changes his name to be further to the front"
>    -- Douglas Adams, _The Meaning of Liff_
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss