eugman on Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:20:49 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Raelus amends p29 |
Well truthfully I think there should be something slight resembling strategy. If someobdy challenges me I want to be able to wager one amplitude so I at least have a chance of winning (well I'd technically have to wager a sixth of the amount he did.) since I apparently lose the ability to make a challenge. Just to be clear as I understand it from reading the upper limit is a third of whoever has the least amplitude's amplitude. > >> I just want to make sure of something. If I challenge someone they can just > wager one amplitude... > The wager applies to both players. > >> The Viktor...amount of Amplitude. > >> ...while I can wager up to a third of the lower of our two amplitudes? It's > the lower of 1/3 of the challenger's A and all of the challengee's...hmm, that > might need fixing... > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss