Re: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole

Dan Schmidt on Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:15:20 -0600 (CST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole
From: Dan Schmidt <tiber264@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=rg+OQ5amAlLLsZ+wqT3usninoMNQ5OFNgY6b7gqASOQ/lssaUvMkhc1o1fsycvj46a3xLYMYiCBHs1vjDb03COHRDclj6MKRQsUHIq/JVkaK3v5MsTErSKpt6vhwoG3l7dMKvkHl2HusshsdTucvjtilv/NiISewBKvDcDfJUJU= ;

When I say "indistingush" I mean "use rule 699/1 as a
loophole".
All actions that change the gamestate are illegal
under 393/0.

Roduni, Yendoru no Taikyoku Sho Jushi, who notes that
playing FF6 gives the player a bad case of Thaumechaphobia


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole
  - From: Jeremy Cook
- Re: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole
  - From: Bryan Donlan

Prev by Date: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Work is sucking the lifeforce from me--I mean, more than usual
Next by Date: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Looptek (Win)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole
Next by thread: Re: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread