| Jeremy Cook on Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:24:38 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: Re: [s-d] Re: Re: Re: [s-b] Wonko's loophole |
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:15:07AM -0800, Dan Schmidt wrote: > When I say "indistingush" I mean "use rule 699/1 as a > loophole". > All actions that change the gamestate are illegal > under 393/0. No, only the ones that aren't legal by some other rule. Zarpint _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss