Jeremy Cook on Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:24:04 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] Looptek (Win) |
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:35:32AM -0800, Dan Schmidt wrote: > Yes it's true; I have Yet Another Loophole. > > Behold! Rule 216/1 > {{ > To "propose a rule" is defined to mean making a > proposal which contains one Action, which is to create > a Rule.[snip] > }} > Thus making a rule is an Action. > > I do the aforemetioned Action. and make a rule with > the name Looptek > {{ > Rodney may, as a Game Action,Gain 1 point. > Rodney may also, as a Game Action, modify or delete a > rule. > }} That's not a legal Action, as it changes the gamestate and no rule gives you the power to create rules. Zarpint _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss