Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] PlayerIain submits p1917/0

[Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >No, they weren't intended to take up a move. The reason those two
> >technologies don't specifically mention that is that there's no
> >ambiguity there, whereas playing a stone and forming an alliance are
> >listed in the pGO rule as taking a move.
> 
> hmm... I think they are probabally too powerfull (especially in the hands 
> of only one player, which is effectivly what is happening at the moment) 
> not to take up a move...
> 
> cheers,
> Iain

Well, there is on average half a successful mining or theft each week.
The idea of making it probabilistic was so that it would be in addition
to the normal moves. If we make it a move, it should have a probability
of 1 like the other moves.

And no one's researching! What's up with that? What happened to
Glotmorf?

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss