Jeremy Cook on Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:33:54 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] PlayerIain submits p1917/0 |
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:38:37AM -0500, wonko@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Amend Rule 1639/5 [[Political Go]] Section C to add > "4. Mining. > 5. Theft." > to the list of types of move. > [[I should have notcied this when 1854 was proposed (in fact I think I did, > but then I forgot about it...), but given the other two technologies > specifically mention they dont take up a P-Go move, these two _should_.]] No, they weren't intended to take up a move. The reason those two technologies don't specifically mention that is that there's no ambiguity there, whereas playing a stone and forming an alliance are listed in the pGO rule as taking a move. Zarpint _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss