Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Aug 2, 2004, at 1.27 AM, Jeremy Cook wrote:

> > I believe 2 is the winner, and thus the subjects should have [s-d] and
> > [s-b] inserted instead of [spoon-business] and [spoon-discuss]
>
> Can we get ellipsis to stop making the header "[s-d] Re: [s-b] foobar"?
> As Phil noted, it would be nice if s-b had a Reply-To header for s-b
> and not s-d.

I agree that removing [s-b] if [s-d] is added, and vice versa, would be 
nice. I do not agree that [s-b] should reply to itself. It used to, in 
ancient days, and we changed it for a reason, because s-b kept getting 
flooded by non-business mails, making it harder to keep track of 
business.

--
Wonko

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm 
not sure about the former.
      -Albert Einstein

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss