|Daniel Lepage on Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:39:59 -0500 (CDT)|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached|
On Aug 2, 2004, at 1.27 AM, Jeremy Cook wrote:
I believe 2 is the winner, and thus the subjects should have [s-d] and [s-b] inserted instead of [spoon-business] and [spoon-discuss]Can we get ellipsis to stop making the header "[s-d] Re: [s-b] foobar"? As Phil noted, it would be nice if s-b had a Reply-To header for s-b and not s-d.
I agree that removing [s-b] if [s-d] is added, and vice versa, would be nice. I do not agree that [s-b] should reply to itself. It used to, in ancient days, and we changed it for a reason, because s-b kept getting flooded by non-business mails, making it harder to keep track of business.
-- WonkoOnly two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
-Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss