Jeremy Cook on Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:27:11 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached |
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:46:48PM -0400, Daniel Lepage wrote: > Ok, Straw Poll Results > > The options were: > 1) Keep the long tags > 2) Use the short tags > 3) Put in new headers > 4) Don't add anything > > The votes were: > > Wonko: 3,2,4,1 > Phil: 4,3,2,1 > bd: 4,3,2,1 > SkArcher: 1,2,3,4 > Teucer: 2,1,3,4 > Sagitta: 4/2 > Glotmorf: 2,4,3,1 > Iain: 2,1,4,3 > Zarpint: 4,3,2,1 > > Now the question is, what's the best method for tallying votes when > various voters used different schemes? > > Plurality winner: tie, 4 vs. 2 > IRV winner: 2 > Condorcet Winner: 2 > Borda winner: 2 > Approval winner: 2 (assuming each player approves of their first two > picks) > > I believe 2 is the winner, and thus the subjects should have [s-d] and > [s-b] inserted instead of [spoon-business] and [spoon-discuss] Can we get ellipsis to stop making the header "[s-d] Re: [s-b] foobar"? As Phil noted, it would be nice if s-b had a Reply-To header for s-b and not s-d. Zarpint _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss