Jeremy Cook on Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:27:11 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached


On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:46:48PM -0400, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> Ok, Straw Poll Results
> 
> The options were:
> 	1) Keep the long tags
> 	2) Use the short tags
> 	3) Put in new headers
> 	4) Don't add anything
> 
> The votes were:
> 
> Wonko: 		3,2,4,1
> Phil: 		4,3,2,1
> bd: 			4,3,2,1
> SkArcher:		1,2,3,4
> Teucer: 		2,1,3,4
> Sagitta: 		4/2
> Glotmorf:		2,4,3,1
> Iain: 		2,1,4,3
> Zarpint: 		4,3,2,1
> 
> Now the question is, what's the best method for tallying votes when 
> various voters used different schemes?
> 
> Plurality winner: tie, 4 vs. 2
> IRV winner: 2
> Condorcet Winner: 2
> Borda winner: 2
> Approval winner: 2 (assuming each player approves of their first two 
> picks)
> 
> I believe 2 is the winner, and thus the subjects should have [s-d] and 
> [s-b] inserted instead of [spoon-business] and [spoon-discuss]

Can we get ellipsis to stop making the header "[s-d] Re: [s-b] foobar"?
As Phil noted, it would be nice if s-b had a Reply-To header for s-b
and not s-d.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss