Re: [spoon-discuss] Re:The Direct Approach.

[Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:18:51 -0500, Araltaln <smgafkjen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> My point is, while an automated system would work great for ruleset
> changes, it would take a good deal of work to create one that would be
> great for gamestate changes. Not, mind you, that at least having an
> automated way to deal with the simple cases is a bad thing, but we
> probably need to start with a method that has players in charge of
> everything, and automate from there. Which, come to think of it, you
> said anyway, bd. So I'm not sure what my point is, just that I have one.
> 
> Although, by the same token, maybe we should start working on a BNF for
> proposals or something.
> 

Well, to take things to the extreme, we could replace the ruleset with
a program, and proposals with patches. Gamestate changes would just be
one-shot scripts. Of course, if it crashes, it'd pose a bit of a
problem.


-- 
bd
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss