Re: [spoon-discuss] Re:The Direct Approach.

[Araltaln <smgafkjen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bryan Donlan wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:09:39 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Peter Lepage 
> <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Once upon a time, we discussed developing a 'proposal language';
> > the idea was that we'd submit proposals online using this language
> > to describe the ruleset changes we wanted to make, we'd vote with a
> > simple web form, and an interpreter script somewhere would process
> > the passing proposals and make the ruleset changes specified. I
> > think it was TPR who volunteered to write this interpreter, but we
> > have heard nothing from him since; one can only assume that real
> > life intervened. So the question is, is anyone else willing and
> > able to write such a thing?
>
>
> Would diffs be sufficient? Under normal circumstances, I suspect, 
> there wouldn't be too many rejected patches, and we can shelve them
> in that case until it's rediffed.

While I'd love to see something like this implemented, I don't think 
every proposal would be submittable under most any system we could come 
up with; even a simple system would work great for standard proposals, 
but how, for instance, would I feed "The Direct Approach" to an interpreter?

--Araltaln
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss