Bill Adlam on 4 Dec 2003 20:45:59 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Rock, Paper, Pirates |
Baron von Skippy wrote: > >The judge is randomly selected from what set? > -Players, I'd think.- Too bad if your judge is on leave. Or if e leaves the game. > >What if the judge's e-mail address is hidden/bouncing? > -We should be able to figure it out based on where their Nomic > messages are coming from. If it's bouncing, well, that's always a > risk anyway, isn't it?- So there should be a contingency plan. > >How do we find out who won? > -We pay attention and see who got the attribute.- How does the admin know whom to give the attribute to? There's no requirement for the judge to tell eim who won. > >For timing reasons I think it's a bad idea for any rule to force a > >player to post a message. In fact, I'm contemplating a proposal to > >that effect. > -Um, so then how would you /rather/ we vote and propose rules and > play Go? It's fine to force message sendings as long as the rule > features a backup plan if a player doesn't post (usually they lose > out on something).- Players aren't forced to do any of those things. If there is a backup plan, it's not forced. Sagitta ________________________________________________________________________ Download Yahoo! Messenger now for a chance to win Live At Knebworth DVDs http://www.yahoo.co.uk/robbiewilliams _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss