[spoon-discuss] INH

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

So now I'm kind of curious. A number of subgames have been created 
recently, yet INH lies unused. What would convince people to make use 
of it? Subgames run independently of everything else can't really 
generate serious revenue, as nobody would want to play if one player 
stood to profit massively from it. The whole point of INH, then, was to 
not only give such subgames a nice place to dump excess points, but 
also to allow those excess points to be used in other subgames that 
spent more than they got.
	INH subgames also have the advantage of costing Dave nothing, since 
the Subgame Statutes are maintained either by some official in the 
subgame, or by me, whereas right now, any change to the rules of Go, 
Tunnelers, or Mercantilism means another database edit for Dave (and 
changes to Go mean more proposal updating and vote counting, too).
	So what I'm wondering is, what is it about INH that makes subgame 
authors unhappy? And more importantly, what could I do to it do make 
people more willing to use it?
	Is the subgame definition too restrictive? Do you think I have too 
much power? Is the entry fee too high? Are you waiting for it to gain 
some real money? Did you just forget about it?

Or do you just think it's a stupid idea in general, and I should give 
it up and nuke the society?

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss