Baron von Skippy on 20 Jul 2003 00:28:01 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Line-jumping |
>> >>Award Anything McGee the title "Knight of the >> Failure Scam." >> > >> >I would say that Anything McGee may be deserving of >> the 'Unwitting Architect' status, as it was his prop >> that bought all this to notice originally >> > >> -I should add "Unwitting Architect" into the Scams >> prop... I'll do it tomorrow. I knew I was forgetting >> something.- > >May I suggest instead you do like we did in our scam >for Mr. in a Spacesuit? "Pawn of the XXXX Scam". > >More in keeping with the pattern. And funnier. > -"Pawn" is already in that proposal, and you're right, it does sort of fit better... I should change the definition of who gets to be a Pawn, though. I don't think that the person who wrote the rules used gets anything yet, or if they do, they get Knight, when they should really get Pawn.- [[BvS]] _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss