Craig on 20 Jul 2003 00:46:01 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Line-jumping

>>> >>Award Anything McGee the title "Knight of the
>>> Failure Scam."
>>> >
>>> >I would say that Anything McGee may be deserving of
>>> the 'Unwitting Architect' status, as it was his prop
>>> that bought all this to notice originally
>>> >
>>> -I should add "Unwitting Architect" into the Scams
>>> prop... I'll do it tomorrow. I knew I was forgetting
>>> something.-
>>May I suggest instead you do like we did in our scam
>>for Mr. in a Spacesuit?  "Pawn of the XXXX Scam".
>>More in keeping with the pattern.  And funnier.
>-"Pawn" is already in that proposal, and you're right, it does sort of fit
better... I should change the definition of who gets to be a
>Pawn, though. I don't think that the person who wrote the rules used gets
anything yet, or if they do, they get Knight, when they should
>really get Pawn.-

There's always "Rook" for the most architectural piece involved...

 -- Teucer

"Best case scenario: free ice cream for all. Worst case scenario: World War


spoon-discuss mailing list