Re: [spoon-discuss] Subgame?

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 28 June 2003 09:53 pm, Rob Speer wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 09:32:02PM -0400, bd wrote:
> > I think the turns should be simeltaneous, with some default action if you
> > don't do anything...
>
> Next nweek - after we're done nuking the Grid and stuff like that - I'm
> going to propose Political Go. (On a 13x13 board, not a 19x19 one, thus
> fixing the big problem that it had on A Nomic.)

What was the problem?

> The "turn order" in that
> game was simple enough - you get to make one move in each span of time
> equivalent to the proposed "checkpoints". Within that time, if you move
> first, you, well, move first. A little bonus for people who are paying
> attention.
>
> (On checkpoints: I don't see any reason there shouldn't be a checkpoint
> at the end of nday 10. Other things have happened during Voting and
> worked just fine.)

Agreed.

- -- 
bd
Many a man has fallen in love with a girl in a light so dim he would
not have chosen a suit by it.
		-- Maurice Chevalier
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+/kcKx533NjVSos4RAncCAJ9lHgPbcvTaHWsOzdoCMQwDmZFeBwCeK9BJ
c5dKeoetekpx7KX3E0yW3hI=
=qUB8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss