Re: [spoon-discuss] Subgame?

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 28 June 2003 09:21 pm, Rob Speer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 11:02:09PM -0400, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> > I've never played, but I can direct you to a sample deck:
> > http://www.dvorakgame.co.uk/cardlist.cgi?timecube
>
> I've seen that deck. It's spiffy. It's made me want to print it out and
> play it as a fixed game, not even adding cards Dvorak-style.
>
> The thing that worries me about the Dvorak rule (and in fact most other
> games that have been proposed) is the turn order thing. What happens
> when (not if) one of the players isn't paying attention? Does it remain
> eir turn until some drastic action makes the game go on?

I think the turns should be simeltaneous, with some default action if you 
don't do anything...

- -- 
bd
Newton's Law of Gravitation:
	What goes up must come down.  But don't expect it to come down where
	you can find it.  Murphy's Law applies to Newton's.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+/kGYx533NjVSos4RAu7BAJ4t1PrPo47ZiWhX1Jj34O0SGMv2kwCgvE+1
rsvtysty3QFFZGVVgBfR7Eo=
=JQ7V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss