| bd on 28 Apr 2003 00:03:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [spoon-discuss] Why we need OO |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 27 April 2003 07:48 pm, Rob Speer wrote: > On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 07:41:11PM -0400, bd wrote: > > RootClass? > > Then everything in existence would be a RootClass. > > If there were a class called RootClass, it should be a subtype of Class, > with its only instance being the Thingy class. Wait - why would we have an Instance of Thingy? I thought it was a base class, like Object in java? - -- bd Quando os pais resolvem deixar de ser quadrados, a filha fica redonda. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+rG+Bx533NjVSos4RAjvCAKCvRRatP0k2AK4YgIzLu1O4v6l2sQCdHUxs gAuTi/xk+7q27srrofuYDAU= =odVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss