Re: [spoon-discuss] Why we need OO

[bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 27 April 2003 07:33 pm, Rob Speer wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 03:13:11PM -0400, bd wrote:
> > > __Object-Orientation__
> > > {{
> > > Everything in the game is an instance of a Class, as defined in the
> > > ClassTree. If not otherwise specified, it is an instance of Thingy.
> >
> > Nitpick: I think 'Object' would be less prone to confuse. Or 'Thing',
> > which just sounds better.
>
> I made this distinction for a reason. The number 3 is part of the Nomic,
> but it is not an Object. Object is defined farther down, and it has more
> specific properties.

RootClass?

> > >   * {10} It follows the Rules.
> >
> > What's the number for?
>
> Chutzpah.

Ah.
- -- 
bd
<Xavvy> is that really knghtbrd?
<Knghtbrd> No, I'm an EVIL IMPOSTOR!
<Knghtbrd> An evil impostor who LIKES HYBRID!
<Xavvy> haha
<Xavvy> ok, it's him :P
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+rGqXx533NjVSos4RAlgmAJsHvvH/UQZ/oHETZSRoFNi+vI2yhgCgmbRi
rMcNbsNjHnMf/H5k4cHRPw4=
=glQN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss