Re: [spoon-discuss] Why we need OO

[Rob Speer <rspeer@xxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 03:13:11PM -0400, bd wrote:
> > __Object-Orientation__
> > {{
> > Everything in the game is an instance of a Class, as defined in the
> > ClassTree. If not otherwise specified, it is an instance of Thingy.
> 
> Nitpick: I think 'Object' would be less prone to confuse. Or 'Thing', which 
> just sounds better.

I made this distinction for a reason. The number 3 is part of the Nomic,
but it is not an Object. Object is defined farther down, and it has more
specific properties.

> >   * {10} It follows the Rules.
> 
> What's the number for?

Chutzpah.

-- 
Rob Speer

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss