Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Uh... Crap...

[Rob Speer <rspeer@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 07:48:40PM -0400, Baron von Skippy wrote:
> I define Wobbly Ducks as follows:
> "A player who holds a Wobbly Duck may SMACK another player with that Wobbly 
> Duck. If a player is SMACKed by a Wobbly Duck, and that player has won in 
> the past nweek, the gamestate is changed such that that player did not win, 
> and such that the player who SMACKed them recieves that win instead. A 
> player may SMACK another player by stating "<player name>: *SMACK*" to a 
> public forum."

Okay. Let's for the moment disregard the fact that everyone broke a rule
in their win scheme, so nobody won.

If someone had actually won, this would be a very spiteful thing to do.
I'm really surprised that there's nothing in the ruleset preventing
taking wins away from someone; I'm pretty sure there was a proposal for
it once. The lack of such a rule is a flaw in the game. Still, wins
should not be taken away.

But you can't do that anyway, because you use the same scheme as
everyone else, which doesn't work.
-- 
Rob Speer

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss