Donald Whytock on 9 Feb 2002 22:31:21 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: spoon-discuss: Re: Breather |
On 2/8/02 at 9:41 AM Tyler Crosby wrote: >>From: "Donald Whytock" <dwhytock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>Reply-To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >>To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >>Subject: spoon-discuss: Re: Breather >>Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 01:30:51 -0500 >> >>On 2/8/02 at 1:00 AM Tyler Crosby wrote: >> >> >5) And finally, the proposal which will get me back on Dave's good side >> >after all that and give us some time to catch our collective breath: >> > >> >{{ >> >__Ahh....__ >> > >> >Create a new rule entitled __A Breather__ with the following -0- >>delimited >> >text: >> > >> >-0- >> >At the beginning of every nweek, the following things shall occur in >>order >> >immediately: >> > >> >1)The following () delimited paragraph shall be appended to the end of >> >rule >> >3/4: >> >() >> >While the Clock is Off, Judgements may be passed and enacted on current >> >CFJs. >> >() >> > >> >2)The Clock will be turned Off. >> > >> >When the Watch reads 1 wweek, the following things shall occur in order >> >immediately: >> > >> >1)The final paragraph of rule 3/5 shall be deleted. >> > >> >2)The Clock will be turned On. >> > >> >3)This rule will repeal itself. >> >-0- >> > >> >[[The purpose of this is to give Dave some time to effectively make all >> >the >> >changes to his DB and the website without being overwhelmed by Real Life >> >(TM) and without us piling on more stuff... It also gives us a little >> >break >> >time and an opportunity to clear up any outstanding CFJs we have... >This >> >is >> >really a good idea folks, think about it. Do it for Mr. >Administrator.]] >> >}} >> >>Automatic rule changes make more work for Mr. A because he's the one who >>has to implement them by hand. :) Why not instead add a rule that says >Mr. >>A can turn The Clock off any time he wants to for up to seven days, so >that >>he can catch up with stuff? >> >> Glotmorf >> >> >In this case it's a non-issue, because it won't really matter if he >updates >the web page while the Clock is off, as the changes are just going to undo >themselves anyway. And the change is important, because without it, we >could not judge CFJs while the Clock is off because only those actions >specifically allowed by the rules may take place then. It seemed to me >that >this would be the best way to accomplish that. > >-0- Thus Spake The Voice -0- So...every nweek there will be a seven-day pause in which we can do nothing but chat and CFJ? Whether or not Mr. A wants or needs or actually makes use of the time? While I don't necessarily want to chain Mr. A to the Nomiculator and force him to work for us, I'd rather the game not be slowed down at a flat rate when it may not be necessary. Besides which, if we vote for something Truly Draconian that makes him hole up and code for a while (and he doesn't veto with his feet), a week might not cut it. I still think it'd be simpler and better for Mr. A to be able to turn the Clock off whenever he needed to. Modify the Clock rule to allow for judgments on CFJs to be submitted, if you think such a thing can't wait for the Clock to be restarted...in fact, do that anyway, so that if a CFJ turns out to be critical Mr. A can turn off the Clock until it gets judged. Glotmorf