David E. Smith on 11 Jan 2002 20:31:41 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Darn zero-based Clock... (nweek 4 ballot)

On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Greg Ritter wrote:

> Grrrrrrr! Rule 215 requires that the Watch's value "must be displayed in
> public view."

Clock != Watch.

The Watch currently has a value of 0/0, since it hasn't been defined to be
anything else, and so isn't required to be displayed. And the Clock is
shot anyway (IMO OC), but for what little it may be worth, the Clock IS
publicly displayed (it's on the first page of the Web site, which is about
as public as I can get).

> Who do I bark at since it's not?

Since the Watch doesn't have to be displayed at this time, nobody. :-)