Re: [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 170

Ed Murphy on Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:41:50 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 170

To: B Nomic Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 170
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:41:01 -0700
In-reply-to: <SNT109-W44EBDDFB398CF41DC79F2985C70@xxxxxxx>
References: <SNT109-W44EBDDFB398CF41DC79F2985C70@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

> 2032 - Appendicitis (0x44)

AGAINST (shouldn't repeal all of Rule 25)

> 2034 - More Cleanup (Wooble) 		 	   		  

FOR
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 170
  - From: James Baxter

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] Hm. I can't find any indication that non-enacted proposals are useless.
Next by Date: [s-b] Ruling on CFI 112
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] [Change] Ballot for Nweek 170
Next by thread: [s-b] [Oracle] Recusals and Reassignments
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread