Re: [s-b] Hm. I can't find any indication that non-enacted proposals are useless.

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

teucer wrote:

> They can't directly cause changes to the gamestate, obviously, but
> other changes can still be carried out as a result of their presence.
> 
> In the absence of an indication to the contrary in the ruleset, a
> statement that a player may do something means that the action is
> possible. (Rule 14.) And players may make use of proposals to amend
> the LOGAS. (Rule 79.)
> 
> I submit the following proposal, entitled "Vacuity": {{Replace all
> instances of the word "green" in rule 77 with "purple."}}
> 
> I use the proposal "Vacuity" to amend the LOGAS by adding the
> following action: {{Disobeying a request from Rule 700.}}
> 
> I hereby request that other players not amend the LOGAS in this fashion.
> 
>  - Rule 700

CFI:  In Rule 79, "its content may be modified using proposals"
should be interpreted as "its content may be modified via the
adoption of a proposal, as specified by that proposal".
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business