Craig Daniel on Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:03:55 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-b] Hm. I can't find any indication that non-enacted proposals are useless.


They can't directly cause changes to the gamestate, obviously, but
other changes can still be carried out as a result of their presence.

In the absence of an indication to the contrary in the ruleset, a
statement that a player may do something means that the action is
possible. (Rule 14.) And players may make use of proposals to amend
the LOGAS. (Rule 79.)

I submit the following proposal, entitled "Vacuity": {{Replace all
instances of the word "green" in rule 77 with "purple."}}

I use the proposal "Vacuity" to amend the LOGAS by adding the
following action: {{Disobeying a request from Rule 700.}}

I hereby request that other players not amend the LOGAS in this fashion.

 - Rule 700
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business