[s-b] [Oracle] CFI 116

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:55:37 +0100
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hm. I can't find any indication that non-enacted proposals are useless.
> 
> 
> > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:39:39 -0700
> > From: emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [s-b] Hm. I can't find any indication that non-enacted proposals are useless.
> > 
> > 
> > CFI:  In Rule 79, "its content may be modified using proposals"
> > should be interpreted as "its content may be modified via the
> > adoption of a proposal, as specified by that proposal".

This is CFI 116. I assign CFI 116 to Judge Gitchel. 		 	   		  


TTttPF 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business