Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers

Jay Campbell on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:23:32 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers

To: B Nomic - Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:23:24 -0800
In-reply-to: <498FE19F.7070909@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <545867.46680.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <498FE19F.7070909@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

I submit a consultation:
Is it permisible to name more than one Unbeliever for a given consultation?
Unbeliever: (I would name one, but I forgot who it was that rejected my consultation about the Loose and Strict Interpretation Leagues. Can anyone remember, and if so, could they post an update please?)


This is Consultation 212.  I assign it to Priest j.

I answer NO. The rule says a consultation, at time of submission, maycontain "the name of a Player that is to be considered as theUnbeliever," entirely in singular.

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
  - From: M P Darke
- Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] A highly original contract
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread