Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers

Ed Murphy on Mon, 9 Feb 2009 00:55:13 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers

To: B Nomic Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:56:15 -0800
In-reply-to: <545867.46680.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <545867.46680.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Marr965 wrote:

> I submit a consultation:
> Is it permisible to name more than one Unbeliever for a given consultation?
> Unbeliever: (I would name one, but I forgot who it was that rejected my consultation about the Loose and Strict Interpretation Leagues. Can anyone remember, and if so, could they post an update please?)

This is Consultation 212.  I assign it to Priest j.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
  - From: Jay Campbell

References:
- [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
  - From: M P Darke

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] More wording shenanigans
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation, collated
Previous by thread: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread