|
Sgeo on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:06:11 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
|
- To: s-b <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation on Unbelievers
- From: Sgeo <sgeoster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:05:40 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+UJzpKs6BcvyTuOsSIuuzsqhtwHiJB7HnUnYMPVB4+Q=; b=FKzJMk3EXXBBroiLPMb/JpPDOZPcnwbYiClq/SRaYYnzN+8ZAIkdslNnJ3KPjgC/Qe i8p4pZE8RfFc+d+6PoKn46uphjgQF2/4UW64BnDCtmjHwDfhkXhUE0HvTlylOuxJqCDX WiTkMicJkUDkkN8VZWAimpR7Hi9jhqnECAZ/0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mN+H74CHwAtWGHgLyPKwsalYQZFgyWzBNN4RUcwXFfNkHrUuloVPFFoow9PkiUz+5n wVgZ+ITSWDyPTB8LL5yatphpEzSvByWjyuAJwneZlUdpnxo7Qc3saJfhR/Xq1A/kMKzf 79KA+PcFaUO7i4XrmhN/NspBGiXSsTrrqZUyo=
- In-reply-to: <545867.46680.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <545867.46680.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:53 AM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I submit a consultation:
> Is it permisible to name more than one Unbeliever for a given consultation?
> Unbeliever: (I would name one, but I forgot who it was that rejected my consultation about the Loose and Strict Interpretation Leagues. Can anyone remember, and if so, could they post an update please?)
>
Perhaps, if you're confused about something, you could try asking in
##nomic or the discussion forum first, maybe someone will help you.
(I'm posting this to spoon-business in case M doesn't read the
discussion list, which I think is plausible.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business