Re: [s-b] Temporally Displaced Forfeiture

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

I object. Give a 20m Oracle with a lot of work to do a break.

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I ZOT this Consultation. Oracle's a bit swamped right now. And I don't
> think
> > there's ground to stand on here. Things cannot be done in the past;
> that's
> > just common sense. Reality trumps any rules that say contrary. If anyone
> > else agrees with M P Darke, I suggest you make the Consultation more
> > general. Like "Can a Player forfeit in the past?" Then I'll reconsider
> > accepting it.
>
> Reality does not, in this fashion, force itself on the platonic gamestate
> of B.
>
> Also: the Staff of ZOT is not there for you to keep Consultations from
> getting decided just because you don't like one of the favored
> answers. If they're uncontroversial, there's no point in calling them
> (and thus ZOTting is appropriate); if they are controversial, then
> naturally you're going to think one of the possible answers is silly.
> The fact that others disagree with you is not a reason to ZOT a
> Consultation.
>
> I intend, with more support than objections, to remove Tyler from the
> Ministry of Questions.
>
>  - teucer
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business