Re: [s-b] Temporally Displaced Forfeiture

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

I ZOT this Consultation. Oracle's a bit swamped right now. And I don't think
there's ground to stand on here. Things cannot be done in the past; that's
just common sense. Reality trumps any rules that say contrary. If anyone
else agrees with M P Darke, I suggest you make the Consultation more
general. Like "Can a Player forfeit in the past?" Then I'll reconsider
accepting it.

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:07 PM, M P Darke <darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I submit a consultation.
> Does the quoted paragraph (shown below) mean that any and all of Warrigal's
> game actions since 12:00:00 TAI on December 25, 1099 are not allowable under
> the rules?
>
> /*Just for clarification, I think that his argument holds water (Rule
> 5E18).*/
>
> "
> At 12:00:00 TAI on December 25, 1099, I forfeit. Arguments: The rules
> say I can forfeit at any time; I pick that one.
>
> "
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business