| Craig Daniel on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:15:00 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Temporally Displaced Forfeiture |
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I ZOT this Consultation. Oracle's a bit swamped right now. And I don't think > there's ground to stand on here. Things cannot be done in the past; that's > just common sense. Reality trumps any rules that say contrary. If anyone > else agrees with M P Darke, I suggest you make the Consultation more > general. Like "Can a Player forfeit in the past?" Then I'll reconsider > accepting it. Reality does not, in this fashion, force itself on the platonic gamestate of B. Also: the Staff of ZOT is not there for you to keep Consultations from getting decided just because you don't like one of the favored answers. If they're uncontroversial, there's no point in calling them (and thus ZOTting is appropriate); if they are controversial, then naturally you're going to think one of the possible answers is silly. The fact that others disagree with you is not a reason to ZOT a Consultation. I intend, with more support than objections, to remove Tyler from the Ministry of Questions. - teucer _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business