| Tyler on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:40:05 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-b] Consultation 190 |
ttpf On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I object. Sorry OCB, but if that were the vote that made the difference, it > would split the game universe. > > > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:21 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > Tough question, but I answer Consultation 190 YES as it is likely that >> there is an External Force with the name Fred (there are >> > plenty of people outside the game with the name Fred). To give a serious >> answer, The beast is defined as an Outsider and must >> > therefore be an External Force. Rule 5E4 takes precedence over Rule 5E50 >> but that is irrelevant as the two Rules do not conflict, >> > Rule 5E50 merely states that the Beast is an Outsider and defers to the >> Rule 5E4 definition of an Outsider causing the Beast to >> > become an External Force. >> >> Unfortunately, you're missing the part where rule 5E4 defines an >> External Force - and its definition does not include the OCB. >> >> In any case, though, I intend without objection to cause the Beast to >> find JamesB's judgment of Consultation 190 CONSISTENT. >> >> > So although we have no idea what External Force is behind Fred (the >> Ranger perhaps?), there is definitely a case for Fred being an >> > External Force (otherwise we could end up with no beast) >> >> Hm. Can a single External Force be two Game Objects? If so, is it one >> Outsider or two? >> >> - teucer >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-business mailing list >> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business >> > > > > -- > -Tyler > -- -Tyler _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business