Tyler on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:40:05 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation 190


ttpf

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I object. Sorry OCB, but if that were the vote that made the difference, it
> would split the game universe.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:21 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Tough question, but I answer Consultation 190 YES as it is likely that
>> there is an External Force with the name Fred (there are
>> > plenty of people outside the game with the name Fred). To give a serious
>> answer, The beast is defined as an Outsider and must
>> > therefore be an External Force. Rule 5E4 takes precedence over Rule 5E50
>> but that is irrelevant as the two Rules do not conflict,
>> > Rule 5E50 merely states that the Beast is an Outsider and defers to the
>> Rule 5E4 definition of an Outsider causing the Beast to
>> > become an External Force.
>>
>> Unfortunately, you're missing the part where rule 5E4 defines an
>> External Force - and its definition does not include the OCB.
>>
>> In any case, though, I intend without objection to cause the Beast to
>> find JamesB's judgment of Consultation 190 CONSISTENT.
>>
>> > So although we have no idea what External Force is behind Fred (the
>> Ranger perhaps?), there is definitely a case for Fred being an
>> > External Force (otherwise we could end up with no beast)
>>
>> Hm. Can a single External Force be two Game Objects? If so, is it one
>> Outsider or two?
>>
>>  - teucer
>>  _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
>
>
>
> --
>  -Tyler
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business