Re: [s-b] Consultation 190

Craig Daniel on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:18:37 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation 190

To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] Consultation 190
From: "Craig Daniel" <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:18:31 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=M1ZXnpaa8fCdw3n2bMElq/9wtA4mo5qgnYo7wc6/6o8=; b=jIjyKdSa1dnY/rjrLdnIadTE1NFT6craELKX+Be5ouizhbCN+cXYo+1j2K3NmhVX3d /7xY4rtVNH31M0LBxUUTJF/2KfrHygP+3SqKMGCxugycbI3zbTfVW6NQYrXhECK/6c+A z+yHDCiiNJj5UlaMA4kRpFFN/33fnaDoDk7x0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=aM5F/wV50knVIzIov3G7jjSKVgswJPzuoyJUWRK/olyFNR/kn7Dl+fqN+4dsopdB2q FoL0DFZen20ttsd4ltTVhojK3YBAB0EmqCylSwJTXIx6OU1YcsBMz2ehy5V9ZZ0fL45Y 5jjtwBtObK6yEZlVghSdxSayX6ptBaxBXnAI4=
In-reply-to: <BAY126-W351D4219B085485E60DC1A85E10@xxxxxxx>
References: <55b258c20901011202t69a97990l42678a920104916c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0901050354j648e43c3x79f2ae07690e8711@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BAY126-W351D4219B085485E60DC1A85E10@xxxxxxx>

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:21 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tough question, but I answer Consultation 190 YES as it is likely that there is an External Force with the name Fred (there are
> plenty of people outside the game with the name Fred). To give a serious answer, The beast is defined as an Outsider and must
> therefore be an External Force. Rule 5E4 takes precedence over Rule 5E50 but that is irrelevant as the two Rules do not conflict,
> Rule 5E50 merely states that the Beast is an Outsider and defers to the Rule 5E4 definition of an Outsider causing the Beast to
> become an External Force.

Unfortunately, you're missing the part where rule 5E4 defines an
External Force - and its definition does not include the OCB.

In any case, though, I intend without objection to cause the Beast to
find JamesB's judgment of Consultation 190 CONSISTENT.

> So although we have no idea what External Force is behind Fred (the Ranger perhaps?), there is definitely a case for Fred being an
> External Force (otherwise we could end up with no beast)

Hm. Can a single External Force be two Game Objects? If so, is it one
Outsider or two?

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- [s-b] Fred has not been playing since the Fourth Era.
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-b] Fred has not been playing since the Fourth Era.
  - From: Tyler
- [s-b] Consultation 190
  - From: James Baxter

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] Consultation: Is ehird still a Player?
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Who's Ordained?
Previous by thread: [s-b] Consultation 190
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] Consultation 190
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread