Re: [s-b] [s-d] Tweak,

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Assuming that we're on the same page, I post the following motion for the
Articles of Incorporation of Black Corporation:
{{ Install Billy Pilgrim to the Office of Chamberlain, and Ty-Guy6 to the
Office of Taskmaster.
}}

I also vote FOR the motion below that adds to paragraph 3.

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  I buy one black sock by paying 100m to the Black Corporation.
>
> /* I would say that the contract could use some amendment. To speed the
> processes we need to perform, let's make an amendment: */
>
> I post the following motion for the Articles of Incorporation of Black
> Corporation:
> {{ Paragraph 3 shall have added to the end, "If at any time all Voting
> Sockholders have voted FOR a Motion, and it has not failed, it automatically
> succeeds." }}
>
> /* You should take Chamberlain; the Co. is your brainchild really. I'll be
> Taskmaster, and get us (me) some employment.
>
> Are you aware that members of the contract are not parties to the contract?
> This means the only thing that is legally binding is in the Incorporation
> rule: "Officers of a Corporation shall collectively ensure that the
> Corporation fulfills the obligations specified in its Articles. An Officer
> can act on behalf of a Corporation by sending a message to the Public Forum
> explicitly stating that the Actions described in the message are being
> performed by the Corporation." What legal entities, if any, are parties to
> this contract? Are you or your bank?
> */
>
>   On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Jamie Dallaire <
> bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Oh hey, that's right.
>>
>> I transfer 2 Black Socks to the Black Corporation.
>>
>> Ty, do you have any preference in terms of which of the 3 offices you
>> want?
>> I'd be up for any, though we do need a Chamberlain and a Taskmaster
>> wouldn't
>> hurt.
>>
>> Anyone else?
>>
>> BP
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Well, Billy P, you do need to get a Chamberlain in there soon, since
>> he's
>> > supposed to pay you for the sock you're going to sell to the Co. so that
>> I
>> > can buy it. (hint hint) Right now the Co. doesn't have one to sell,
>> > correct?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jamie Dallaire <
>> bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Actually, I like your work co-op. But I don't have the mack to buy
>> even
>> > > one
>> > > > sock. Maybe next week I will, when a few props of mine pass. Unless
>> you
>> > > > were
>> > > > willing to loan me about 50 mack? First of all, you should resolve
>> that
>> > > > rewrite motion and dividend yourself something. You've got 500 mack
>> in
>> > > > there
>> > > > you probably don't want to share with me.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > I give m50 to Ty-Guy6.
>> > >
>> > > I vote FOR the last Motion I submitted in Black Corporation.
>> > >
>> > > I resolve the same Motion.
>> > >
>> > > I can't dividend myself except by using an unwieldy process that
>> involves
>> > > passing another motion to install myself in an office with
>> authorization
>> > to
>> > > do so. We currently have no officers. Don't need to do any dividending
>> at
>> > > this point anyway, I figure.
>> > >
>> > > Billy Pilgrim
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > spoon-business mailing list
>> > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > spoon-discuss mailing list
>> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>  >
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business