Tyler on Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:15:51 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Tweak,


I buy one black sock by paying 100m to the Black Corporation.

/* I would say that the contract could use some amendment. To speed the
processes we need to perform, let's make an amendment: */

I post the following motion for the Articles of Incorporation of Black
Corporation:
{{ Paragraph 3 shall have added to the end, "If at any time all Voting
Sockholders have voted FOR a Motion, and it has not failed, it automatically
succeeds." }}

/* You should take Chamberlain; the Co. is your brainchild really. I'll be
Taskmaster, and get us (me) some employment.

Are you aware that members of the contract are not parties to the contract?
This means the only thing that is legally binding is in the Incorporation
rule: "Officers of a Corporation shall collectively ensure that the
Corporation fulfills the obligations specified in its Articles. An Officer
can act on behalf of a Corporation by sending a message to the Public Forum
explicitly stating that the Actions described in the message are being
performed by the Corporation." What legal entities, if any, are parties to
this contract? Are you or your bank?
*/

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Oh hey, that's right.
>
> I transfer 2 Black Socks to the Black Corporation.
>
> Ty, do you have any preference in terms of which of the 3 offices you want?
> I'd be up for any, though we do need a Chamberlain and a Taskmaster
> wouldn't
> hurt.
>
> Anyone else?
>
> BP
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Well, Billy P, you do need to get a Chamberlain in there soon, since he's
> > supposed to pay you for the sock you're going to sell to the Co. so that
> I
> > can buy it. (hint hint) Right now the Co. doesn't have one to sell,
> > correct?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Jamie Dallaire <
> bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Actually, I like your work co-op. But I don't have the mack to buy
> even
> > > one
> > > > sock. Maybe next week I will, when a few props of mine pass. Unless
> you
> > > > were
> > > > willing to loan me about 50 mack? First of all, you should resolve
> that
> > > > rewrite motion and dividend yourself something. You've got 500 mack
> in
> > > > there
> > > > you probably don't want to share with me.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I give m50 to Ty-Guy6.
> > >
> > > I vote FOR the last Motion I submitted in Black Corporation.
> > >
> > > I resolve the same Motion.
> > >
> > > I can't dividend myself except by using an unwieldy process that
> involves
> > > passing another motion to install myself in an office with
> authorization
> > to
> > > do so. We currently have no officers. Don't need to do any dividending
> at
> > > this point anyway, I figure.
> > >
> > > Billy Pilgrim
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-business mailing list
> > > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>  >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business