ihope on Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:45:02 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Rule Categorization

On 07/02/2008, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I answer this consultation NO, with the Oracularity of "All proposals
> with the title of Enough Already! as well as all Consultations
> numbered 105 are destroyed." If this Consultation didn't exist,
> wonderful; if it did exist, now it doesn't.

I Claim this answer to be Consistent, since I apparently can do that.

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
spoon-business mailing list