Jamie Dallaire on Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:29:42 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Rule Categorization |
On Feb 6, 2008 5:50 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Blame it on Murphy. I just plagiarized the thing. I revise the > proposal titled "Enough Already!" to read: > { > Repeal all rules except for 4E0 through 4E40 and 4E42 through 4E100 > } I submit the following consultation: Question: At the time of this consultation's submission, does there exist a Proposal titled "Enough Already!"? Reasoning: I can't say, but you should know what I mean. wink wink. Oracularity, please. Billy Pilgrim _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business