Jamie Dallaire on Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:29:42 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Rule Categorization

On Feb 6, 2008 5:50 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Blame it on Murphy. I just plagiarized the thing. I revise the
> proposal titled "Enough Already!" to read:
> {
> Repeal all rules except for 4E0 through 4E40 and 4E42 through 4E100
> }

I submit the following consultation:

Question: At the time of this consultation's submission, does there exist a
Proposal titled "Enough Already!"?

Reasoning: I can't say, but you should know what I mean. wink wink.
Oracularity, please.

Billy Pilgrim
spoon-business mailing list