Re: [s-b] [s-d] Rule Categorization

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Feb 6, 2008 10:29 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 5:50 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Blame it on Murphy. I just plagiarized the thing. I revise the
> > proposal titled "Enough Already!" to read:
> > {
> > Repeal all rules except for 4E0 through 4E40 and 4E42 through 4E100
> > }
>
>
> I submit the following consultation:
>
> Question: At the time of this consultation's submission, does there exist a
> Proposal titled "Enough Already!"?
>
> Reasoning: I can't say, but you should know what I mean. wink wink.
> Oracularity, please.
>

This is Consultation #105. I assign it to Priest Ivan Hope.

NOTE: This consultation can only be found to be YES. If it is found to
be NO, then it would not be a consultation, since both the message
that called it and this message include the text of the quasi-proposal
"Enough Already!".

Oracle BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business