Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation -- Rule 41

ihope on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:42:18 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation -- Rule 41

To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation -- Rule 41
From: ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:42:12 -0500
In-reply-to: <7db5cba20801150433n3f92ea9dwe1ed35d41f60ff93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <277041.36087.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141641t1d502337j92bfb430d16070a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141644x1724f06xe1c4595846d3f6b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20801150433n3f92ea9dwe1ed35d41f60ff93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 15/01/2008, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Was there more you wanted to add?

Oops. I failed to notice the other messages pertaining to this.

Anyway, I claim Dominov's Answer to this Consultation involving Rule
41 to be Consistent.

--Ivan Hope CXXVII
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- Re: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: Justin Ahmann
- Re: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: Spencer Baugh

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Message of the nweek
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] Various things
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation -- Rule 41
Next by thread: [s-b] [MoC] Proposal 298
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread